Who Thought This Was a Good Idea?
Perhaps this is an unnecessary and reactionary response on my part, but I have this itching feeling that this isn't a very old problem. Bringing the laity into greater participation in the Church and all whatnot is great, but this is that sort of abuse that has "spirit of Vatican II" writen all over it.
Which, if I may continue my little diatribe, makes me think of something else. It seems to me that anytime you go trying to ascribe principles and characteristics to something that it does not truly possess, that you create a world of trouble for yourself. For instance: both the "spirit of Vatican II" language of Church modernists and the "living Constitution" language of legal liberals tend to wreak havoc on their respective fields by attributing qualities of life to a fundamentally inanimate object (the VII documents and the Constitution). From here you could likely get into an entire Aristotelian discussion of things' natures and the roles and treatments that arise out of them, but I won't do that. Suffice to say for the moment that just like Frankenstein, bad things happen when you try to bring dead things to life.
File Under: Loonies, The_Liturgy
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home